🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold policy to prohibit social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Politicians, campaigners, and parents are monitoring intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a rising group of countries are moving toward parallel restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that smartphones and platforms are "robbing our children's innocence". The policy is expected to be formalized in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to implement a age restriction of 15, citing the need to safeguard children from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media users. Authorities have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "an measures on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on parliament to approve a proposal lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a related action, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Dutch government has advised guardians to block their children from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a symbolic statement demanding a ban for under-16s except if parental consent is granted. Even though it warns of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the move does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a useful starting point," commented a leading parliamentarian driving the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Eye

For the United Kingdom, the administration has remained open to a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "supported by conclusive research".

Earlier, interest gathered behind a proposal to impose limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. Instead, the government committed to further research the issue.

Advocacy groups have expressed warnings. An organization established by the loved ones of a young person who took her own life after being exposed to dangerous platform posts argues that a simple age ban could fail to protect children and could lead to a "cliff edge" of harm when young people turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to create platforms and apps that are appropriate and age appropriate for children," stated a leading peer.

The US: A Decentralized Picture

In the United States, regulation is mostly occurring at the local level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• Utah mandates parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• The state of Florida has signed a bill barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a rule limiting minors to one hour of social media access per day, with additional use needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed measures demanding guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from various individuals to copy Australia's path, a nationwide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

International Perspectives

Apart from Europe and the US, additional countries are also exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the required age for one major platform to 16.

But, world bodies take a more cautious tone. A major UN agency has warned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "could have unintended consequences". The body notes that the internet can be a "critical link" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to improve safety.

As this international discussion evolves, the actions of this nation and several other countries demonstrate that policymakers globally are no longer content to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.